Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagepython
Severitylow
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Confidence LevelLow
Impact LevelMedium
Likelihood LevelLow

Description

The code uses user-supplied values from flask.request.host to build URLs or HTTP requests without validating them. This allows attackers to manipulate the Host header and potentially influence how your app constructs requests or handles authentication.

Impact

If exploited, attackers could perform actions like bypassing authentication, triggering password resets to attacker-controlled URLs, or causing your server to make malicious requests (SSRF). This could lead to data leaks, account compromise, or unauthorized access to internal systems.

Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagepython
Severitymedium
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Confidence LevelMedium
Impact LevelMedium
Likelihood LevelMedium

Description

After confirming a Django form is valid, accessing user input directly from request.POST instead of using form.cleaned_data bypasses Django’s input sanitization. This can allow unsanitized or unexpected data to be processed by your application.

Impact

If exploited, attackers could submit malicious data that passes validation but is still accessed unsafely, potentially leading to security issues such as injection attacks, data corruption, or unexpected application behavior. This undermines Django’s form security and can compromise the integrity of your application.

Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagebash
Severitylow
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
OWASPA03:2021 - Injection
Confidence LevelLow
Impact LevelLow
Likelihood LevelLow

Description

Setting the IFS (Internal Field Separator) variable globally in Bash scripts can change how input is split, potentially leading to unexpected behavior or security issues. This can cause scripts to incorrectly parse user input or files, especially when expanding unquoted variables.

Impact

If an attacker can influence input or the environment, they may exploit the altered IFS setting to inject unexpected values or commands, possibly bypassing intended input checks or causing code execution. This can lead to data corruption, privilege escalation, or script malfunction.

Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagesolidity
Severityhigh
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Confidence LevelHigh
Impact LevelMedium
Likelihood LevelMedium

Description

Using abi.encodePacked with multiple dynamic-length arguments (like bytes, string, or arrays) in hashing functions can lead to data collisions, where different inputs produce the same hash. This is because the packed encoding can cause ambiguity in how data boundaries are interpreted.

Impact

An attacker could exploit this collision to bypass security checks, impersonate users, or manipulate contracts relying on unique hashes for authentication, signatures, or transaction integrity. This may lead to unauthorized access, theft of funds, or other critical contract failures.

Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagesolidity
Severityhigh
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Confidence LevelLow
Impact LevelHigh
Likelihood LevelHigh

Description

The contract uses delegatecall with an address provided by external input, allowing untrusted users to execute code in the context of your contract. This means attackers can control what code runs and access your contract’s storage.

Impact

If exploited, an attacker could execute arbitrary code with your contract’s privileges, potentially stealing funds, corrupting data, or taking full control of the contract. This could lead to significant financial loss and compromise the security of your entire dApp or platform.

Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagesolidity
Severityhigh
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Confidence LevelLow
Impact LevelHigh
Likelihood LevelHigh

Description

The code allows external users to specify both the address and data for a low-level call() function, enabling them to trigger arbitrary external contract calls without validation. This exposes the contract to external control over its behavior.

Impact

An attacker could exploit this to execute malicious code, drain funds, or manipulate contract logic by making unauthorized calls to any contract. This can lead to loss of assets, theft, or complete compromise of the contract and its users.

Improper Input Validation

Property
Languagesolidity
Severitycritical
CWECWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Confidence LevelHigh
Impact LevelHigh
Likelihood LevelHigh

Description

The contract decodes user-supplied context (ctx) without validating its authenticity, allowing attackers to craft calldata that impersonates other accounts. This missing input validation exposes the contract to unauthorized actions.

Impact

If exploited, attackers can perform actions as if they were other users, potentially leading to theft of funds, unauthorized token transfers, or manipulation of contract state. This can result in severe financial and reputational damage to both users and the organization.

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’)

Property
Languagecsharp
Severitymedium
CWECWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’)
OWASPA05:2017 - Broken Access Control
Confidence LevelMedium
Impact LevelMedium
Likelihood LevelLow

Description

User input is combined into file paths using Path.Combine without first sanitizing it with Path.GetFileName. This allows attackers to craft input that accesses files or directories outside the intended location.

Impact

If exploited, an attacker could read from or write to sensitive files on the server by performing path traversal (e.g., using ‘../’). This can lead to data exposure, overwriting important files, or enabling further attacks against the system.

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’)

Property
Languagegeneric
Severitymedium
CWECWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’)
OWASPA05:2017 - Broken Access Control
Confidence LevelMedium
Impact LevelMedium
Likelihood LevelMedium

Description

The code uses untrusted user input from request parameters to specify the file path in a render call. This allows attackers to control which local files are rendered and potentially exposed.

Impact

An attacker could exploit this to read sensitive files from the server, such as application configuration, credentials, or other private data. This can lead to data breaches and compromise of system security.

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’)

Property
Languagegeneric
Severitylow
CWECWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory (‘Path Traversal’)
OWASPA05:2017 - Broken Access Control
Confidence LevelLow
Impact LevelLow
Likelihood LevelLow

Description

In nginx configuration, using the ‘alias’ directive in a ’location’ block without a trailing slash on the location path can allow attackers to access files outside the intended directory. This misconfiguration makes the server vulnerable to path traversal attacks.